So Tyler’s guilty. That’s what they want you to believe. But I know who made the call. There is nothing they can’t do to you because they don’t consider you human. They don’t believe you have a soul. Tucker Carison just exposed who ordered Charlie Kirk’s hit, revealing the hidden power network he says has been pulling the strings from the shadows all along.

Charlie Kirk was two weeks ago today in an event that clearly is going to change American history. Changed a lot of people inside. And there was a moment in the first week where you thought to yourself, this is going to have effects. A lot of them are going to be bad, but some of them are probably going to be good because Charlie’s life was itself so good.

 Charlie Kirk spent his life above all trying to live the Christian gospel and trying to live the principle of free speech which is to say he talked and he also listened. He was most famous for traveling from college campus to college to campus and asking people who disagreed with him to confront him. Ask me anything he said.

 And he sat there patiently as they did and they often attacked him. They almost always expressed views he found repugnant and almost always he took those views seriously and answered the questions put to him as crisply and honestly as he could. That’s what he spent his life doing. And in fact, he was while doing that.

 Tucker asserts that one lesson from Charlie Kirk’s life is that sincere Christians are at their core genuinely decent people grounded in faith, conviction, and a sense of purpose that stands out in a cynical world. So if there’s any lesson from Charlie Kirk’s life, well the first lesson would probably be sincere Christians tend to be really decent people.

 Maybe we should have more of them. But the more secular temporal lesson is that free speech is a virtue. It is in fact the foundation of this country. Not only its laws but its culture and that we should protect it. And maybe if we seek to honor Charlie Kirk, we should emulate it. Maybe we should begin by asking our politicians to do what Charlie Kirk spent his life doing, which is to answer the question.

Just calmly answer the question. We’ll ask you anything and then you go ahead and answer it to the best of your ability. Like for example, who blew up the Nordstream pipeline? What happened to all the money we sent to you? Why haven’t you released all the JFK files, etc., etc., etc., all the questions on your mind that slowly drive you crazy because no one will address them? Why don’t we just ask them directly to our leaders and they get to answer? Nothing.

Tucker asserts that nothing would honor Charlie Kirk’s memory more than defending free speech, the very principle he lived by and refused to compromise, no matter the cost. Nothing would honor Charlie Kirk’s memory more than that. That is free speech in action. But nothing like that happened. Instead, the only real conversation we’ve had about free speech has been about Jimmy Kimmel, who is hardly a champion of free speech. In fact, just the opposite.

 He’s a nasty little sensor, talentless, a person who has many times on camera over the years chuckled and applauded as other people, his political enemies, have been silenced. a guy who has so little influence in American society and so little audience he was on his way out anyway has the job only as a result of some kind of weird political affirmative action where people who agree with studio heads get to have late night jobs.

 He is hardly the person who should be taking up the cause of free speech or become a symbol of it because of course he’s the symbol of censorship and has been for most of his career. Only someone who appreciates the person he’s speaking to as an actual human being could speak that way. Notice how rare that is. It’s been noted in the past couple of days Charlie was a free speech champion. Absolutely he was.

 And I pray that that’s his legacy. But I also think it’s important to explain why that mattered to him. It was not abstract in any sense. It was central. It was the core because consider what it means if you don’t respect free speech which is another way of saying free conscience the right of other people to make up their own minds about the basic questions of what what is right or wrong and to express their views on those issues.

 If you don’t acknowledge the right of other people to do that and if you take steps to prevent them from doing that what are you really saying? You’re really saying I don’t think you have a soul. I think you’re a meat puppet I can control. I think you’re an animal maybe suban animal. You’re a you’re a person to whom I can dictate belief.

 I don’t acknowledge that you have the right to come to your own conclusion is another way of saying I don’t acknowledge that you’re a human being. It’s dark. There’s nothing darker than that. And trust me, they believe it. The ones who’ve thought about it, and there are a lot of those. But for a lot of people, particularly those who are just repeating what they think they should say or responding to the momentary rage of the moment, they just throw stuff out.

 And we’ve got to hope that the attorney general of the United States, Pam Bondi, is in that category. She said this just yesterday. There’s free speech and then there’s hate speech. And there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie, in our society. Tucker claims that the establishment now draws a false line between free speech and hate speech, using that divide to decide which voices get silenced and which are allowed to speak.

 There’s free speech and then there’s hate speech. This is the attorney general of the United States, the chief law enforcement officer of the United States telling you that there is this other category called hate speech. And of course, the implication is that’s a there’s almost no sentence that Charlie Kirk, and I’m I’m not running the risk of appropriating his memory for my own ends by saying this, it’s provable.

There’s no sentence that Charlie Kirk would have objected to more than that. And you’ve got to think the attorney general didn’t think it through and was not attempting to desecrate the memory of the person she was purporting to celebrate. That she just threw that out there. That she hadn’t thought about it.

You hope that. You hope that Charlie Kirk won’t be used by a group we now call bad actors to create a society that was the opposite of the one he worked to build. You hope that you hope that a year from now the turmoil we’re seeing in the aftermath of his won’t be leveraged to bring hate speech laws to this country.

And trust me, if it is, if that does happen, there is never a more justified moment for civil disobedience than that ever. And there never will be. Because if they can tell you what to say, they’re telling you what to think. There is nothing they can’t do to you because they don’t consider you human. They don’t believe you have a soul.

 A human being with a soul, a free man, has a right to say what he believes, not to hurt other people, but to express his views. And by the way, that thinking, and not to pile on the attorney general, who’s a very nice person, but that thinking that she just articulated on camera there is exactly what got us to a place where some huge and horrifying percentage of young people think it’s okay to people you disagree with to for saying things they don’t like.

 Tucker believes free speech was crushed after years of school indoctrination that taught people to fear opposing ideas. Why do they believe that? How did we get here? Is it the video games? Is it the SSRIs? Yeah, probably. But what it really is is 12 and then 16 years of indoctrination in our schools at the hands of people who tell them that, who say exactly what the attorney general just said.

 Well, there’s free speech, which of course we all acknowledge is important. So, so important. But then there’s this thing called hate speech. Hate speech, of course, is any speech that the people in power hate. But they don’t define it that way. They define it as speech that hurts people. Speech that is tantamount to violence.

 And we punish violence, don’t we? Of course we do. They’ve been taught that every year of their lives. And so naturally, most of them believe it. So when Charlie Kirk is in the throat with a 306 on camera, I doubt very many young Americans want to see something like that or actually applaud the death of a man, a father, a husband.

 But they’ve been told for their entire lives in schools exactly what Pam Bondi just told them. Well, there’s free speech, but then there’s also hate speech. And woe to those who engage in it because it’s a that’s a lie. And it’s a lie that denies the humanity of the people you’re telling it about. And so any attempt to impose hate speech laws in this country, and trust me, there are a lot of people who would like them.

There are a lot of people who’d like to codify their own beliefs by punishing those under the US code who disagree with their beliefs. Any attempt to do that is a denial of the humanity of American citizens and cannot be allowed under any circumstances. That’s got to be the red line because again, when they can do that, what can’t they do? And this is something, by the way, that Charlie thought about a lot and that I had occasion to talk to him about a lot.

And I really don’t want to make any of this about me because it has nothing to do with me. But I did have reason to have these conversations with Charlie uh a lot, many, many times over the past 3 or 4 months. And this began um at an event that he held in Florida in July, the TPUSA MFEST event, Turning Point event.

I often go, I always have the best time. I always see Charlie ahead of time. We have a cup of coffee in a hotel room, talk about what’s going on. In addition to being, of course, a conservative advocate. He was also a conservative organizer and a coalition builder and he was very involved in politics in a way that I’m not.

 So, it was interesting as hell. But it was also a way to learn what young people are thinking about, talking about, cuz he was on college campuses all the time. and what is the state of a couple of big debates that are happening within the Republican coalition particularly around foreign policy and Charlie’s views on foreign policy which I think are fairly wellnown now a lot of people lying about them um were evolving uh but had really evolved people with power don’t want to hear disagreement they don’t want to be challenged Tyler’s fingerprints

whose fingerprints were on the story Tucker Carlson just exposed osed who ordered Charlie Kirk’s hit, pointing to the hidden powers he says have been pulling the strings from the shadows. There are certain parts of the the intel world uh in that do not support some things that Benjamin Netanyahu has done recently.

 So, it’s not the same as attacking attacking BB, but I I don’t think I’ve ever seen anything lower than his attempt to hijack Charlie’s memory and use it for his own political ends, particularly because what he said was completely untrue. Charlie didn’t hate Jews. He loved Jews. He had tons of friends who were Jews. He loved the state of Israel.

 He loved going there. He did not like BB Netanyahu. And he said that to me many times. And he said it to people around him many times. He felt that BB Netanyahu was a very destructive force. He was appalled by what was happening in he was above all resentful that he believed Netanyahu was using the United States to prosecute his for the benefit of his country and that it was shameful and embarrassing and bad for the United States and he resented it.

 Didn’t hate Netanyahu. He wasn’t out there with a placard saying that. But he certainly expressed that to me and a lot of other people and there’s no question that BB’s defenders uh on the internet will call me a liar or a kook. Uh but that’s a fact and enough text messages exist that I think it can probably be verified in pretty short order.

 Not that it needs to be because that is true. Tucker asserts that during one of Charlie’s speeches, the hostility toward him was palpable. an intense organized effort to tear him down right as he challenged the establishment narrative. Shortly after that speech, there was a very intense attack on Charlie and to some extent on me.

 Not that I really noticed, but on him. I have no donors. He had $100 million worth of donors. And so, because he was involved in a different project from just yapping on the internet, which is what I do for a living, um he was dependent to a great extent on his donors. Of course, it’s a nonprofit.

 And they went after him and tormented him. Not all, of course. Many were supportive, but uh the ones who were offended by my speech and there was a a small very intense group who were tormented Charlie Kirk until the day he 2 days before he he lost a $2 million donation because he had publicly pledged to bring me to the next Turning Point conference in December.

 And he told me over the past couple of months he was losing a lot of donations over that pledge. They put out a flyer basically saying that I was going to be at this event giving a speech. And so he would text me and say, “Man, I’m really taking a lot of heat for this and people are really mad.” Tucker points out that the American Jewish Committee labeled Charlie Kirk an anti-Semite and dangerous.

 Claims he says are completely false and part of a broader smear meant to destroy his reputation. The American Jewish Committee called in a statement Charlie Kirk an anti-semite and quote dangerous. Charlie Kirk an anti-semite. Yeah. um he was not an anti-semite. He was the opposite and he was not dangerous. He was a great lover of people and a purveyor of peace.

 He was the opposite and he was very stung by that. Those of us who’ve been called names for a long time are a little bit harder to offend. Charlie was deeply offended by that and expressed some of those feelings on Megan Kelly show and in other places, but that did not let up. The reason I’m telling the story is because he called me and then came to see me at my house about this topic.

 And uh I said to him every single time, look, it’s, you know, I’ve got my own way to communicate my views. This is actually not the most important issue to me. There lots of things I can talk about. I don’t need to come to turning point. I can take a year off. No problem. I hated seeing how much he was suffering.

 The hassle he was getting from people. Uh and I was being attacked too, by the way. There was a huge effort uh I wasn’t fully aware of it actually because I don’t go online that much but there was a huge effort by people some of whom I know and have helped and like Seth Dylan of the Babylon B for example someone who had his own problems with free speech who was famously cancelled shocking that someone whose whole persona is wrapped up in the idea that we all get to speak and if you don’t like it make a more compelling case that that person and

many others like him were advocating for me getting pulled off the stage because they don’t like what I’m saying. This is a trend and one that we should be really concerned about. It’s not just about, by the way, at all. Tucker claims that people in power can’t stand dissent. They don’t want to be questioned, don’t want to be challenged, and will do anything to silence those who do.

The trend is really simple. People with power don’t want to hear disagreement. They don’t want to be challenged ever. That’s why we have free speech to acknowledge that even those of us or people with less power still have a right to talk because they’re human beings. You don’t own them. So time after time, Charlie would call me or come to see me and let me know, wow, or show me text messages.

 These people are really mad that you’re speaking. And I would always have the same thought like I feel pretty moderate actually. I’ve never been an hater. Obviously, I’m not an anti-semite. I just don’t want to moral and I don’t want a foreign country humiliating my country and telling us what our laws have to be.

 I mean, this seems like pretty basic America first stuff. And he would say, I totally agree with you, but they want you off the stage. And I would always say, no problem. And he would say, no, it’s important. It’s a matter of principle. I want you to be there. Great. By the way, I’m not accusing anyone of being involved in them.

 I’m not trying to mutter darkly or imply anything. We don’t there’s a lot we don’t know about who Charlie and why. But I I don’t know and I’m not going to pretend that I do. But I think it’s important to say that out loud because it’s a fact and there are many liars out there trying BB Netanyahu number one among them shamefully who are trying to distort the truth.

 A truth that I know and can prove. And the last thing I’ll say about Charlie is that his views were changing on topics that had nothing to do with foreign policy. You know, the famous kind of red line, third rail, can’t talk about it. But it’s possible that the subject that makes people even matter in Washington, New York, and LA than having non-conventional foreign policy views is having non-conventional economic views.

Man, they really don’t like that at all. And Charlie’s views on economics and on the way that wealth is distributed in the United States were changing fast. Really changing fast and and hardening. Not because he was a socialist. Hardly. He was about as much of a socialist as I am. Not at all.

 Um but because he lived here and he spent a lot of time with young people and he couldn’t help but notice because he was an observant and honest person that they’re not thriving at all and that the chances they’ll have lives comparable to the ones they had growing up are very small. Most of them won’t have houses. They won’t own anything. They’ll be in debt.

And for that reason, they won’t get married or have children. Tucker asserts that many born in America will not carry on its legacy, warning that the nation’s cultural and moral inheritance is being abandoned by those who should be defending it. And so, the people who are born here won’t continue their legacy in the United States.

 It’s it’s the end of our civilization. And the root of a lot of this is spiritual, but the root is also economic. And it raises a question, a basic question of fairness. And I tried to address this in the speech that I gave for Charlie in July. I don’t think I did a very good job and it was misinterpreted. But I I invoked Bill Aman.

 And the point I was making had nothing to do with Bill Aman being a even being an Epstein friend. I mean, I I don’t really know anything about that. I don’t know much about I’m not accusing blackman of I’m not accusing him of you know being a creep or a massage agent or anything like that. I don’t think that I don’t know that for sure.

 And I wasn’t trying to say it. What I was trying to say is that Bill Aman is not creative, not particularly intelligent. And my only point was if you live in a society that awards the spoils to people on the basis of those two qualities like the most aggressive, the best connected people get the richest, that’s a dysfunctional society.

There should be a reward for creativity and decency and hard work, steadfastness, following the rules. Like you should have to add to the sum total of your society. You’d think it’s not an argument against the free market. It’s an argument against whatever we’re living through right now. This is really dark and ugly.

 And if people like Bill Aman are getting the richest, what has Bill Aman done? Shorted the market or something? Talk down herbal life. I mean, I’m not even saying that should be illegal. All I’m saying is if that’s one of the richest guys in your society, you’ve got a very sick society. I don’t think Billman’s like a drooling idiot or anything, but like when was the last time you heard Bill Aman say something constructive or creative? Like never.

So, it’s just bad. And it’s not just about Bill Aman, of course. I mean, he’s just a minor player in the life of the world, but he’s a kind of metaphor for how off track we’ve gone. And that doesn’t seem like a socialist point. Once again, I’m hardly a socialist and neither was Charlie Kirk. That seems like a Christian point.

 Fairness is at the root of the Christian story. People will be judged not by who their parents were or by how they look, but on their hearts, on themselves, on choices that they made. That’s fair. So again, fairness is essential to the gospel and it’s essential to any working society. In a fair society or a society that its citizens believe is fair, people will comply voluntarily with the rules because they don’t think the game is rigged.

 But in a society in which Bill Aman, Bill Aman makes $7 billion and like the smartest, hardest working, most interesting, creative young people, you know, can never own a home in a society like that, you’re going to get Mum Donnie as mayor, you’re going to get a lot of bad things because people will opt out of the society because they know it’s not fair.

It’s rigged.