He’s nervous, excited. He’s got he’s got his adrenaline running. He knows he’s about to get the signal to this man right here, Charlie Kirk. So, let’s take a look. He’s staring down off into nothingness. Notice here his his arm is his left arm is somewhat relaxed and bent slightly. That will remain bent. His left arm will remain with a slight bend in it.

 And he will continue to look off into nothingness until he gets the signal to take the shot. at which time you will see this arm go completely straight like he’s setting up a block. And at the same time, he turns his head for the very first time to look at Charlie and acquire his target. He will then lift his fist, his right-handed fist, which is containing and concealing what’s called a palm pistol, like this one right here.

 And that palm will be aimed, I’m assuming, at Charlie Kirk’s center mass, where he then squeezes the palm pistol, fires the round, and Charlie Kirk. Let’s take a look at this as it w it full speed here again. Take a look. books. So, now that you know what to look for, you’re not telling anybody. Boom. Just murder charge. The science doesn’t match the story.

 And when the evidence starts fighting the narrative, you already know something’s off. First bombshell, the bullet casing. The round recovered at the scene allegedly does not match the rifle Tyler was accused of firing. Not just a small mismatch, sis. A completely different class of firearm. The ballistic signature, the rifling, the caliber, none of it lined up.

 That right there should have been game over. Normally, when the casing clears the suspect, you reset the investigation. But instead, they kept Tyler’s face on the front page like the ending was already written. Second crack, witnesses. Multiple people on the ground said the didn’t come from where Tyler was standing at all.

 They swore the sound and angle came from above, rooftop territory. One even told officers repeatedly it came from higher up. Another said they saw a figure moving across the roof just seconds after. And a third claimed they heard two distinct fire sources. Not an echo, not distortion, two separate pops. But did any of that make it into the press conference? Nope.

 Those statements were incomplete, misfiled, or just plain redacted allegedly. And now the whispers are louder. An FBI insider has named a sec, not in a press briefing, not for the cameras, but behind closed doors, the kind of quiet acknowledgement that tells you the system knows Tyler wasn’t the trigger man, but they need a face to sell the public. Think about it.

 If the recovered round didn’t come from Tyler’s rifle, then someone else pulled that trigger. If witnesses saw a figure retreating on the rooftop, then somebody else had the vantage point. And if an FBI agent is privately admitting there was a second, then why is Tyler still in custody? Another angle of a potential of where this could have Charlie Kirk now about Charlie Kirk.

 Is that that’s the one, right? Is that the one we’re talking about that conversation? Yeah. Yeah. That that was and from my opinion, Patrick, this dude and a bunch of and a bunch of snipers and me and Tom actually had a conversation last night. Never go with the official narrative. And when you’re seeing different angles, and me and Mike even talked about this, too, and I don’t want to show close-ups or anything like that, Pat, cuz I I don’t want to get it gets they blew our face.

From the jump, the FBI and local officials came out swinging with a tidy little package. Good cops, good teamwork, justice delivered. They stood at the podium, rattling off numbers. 7,000 leads overnight, 11,000 the next morning. As if quantity proved quality. Tyler Robinson’s mug shot wasn’t rolled out as a suspect, it was rolled out as the conclusion.

 That was the public spin. Clean, quick, comforting. But the forensic receipts tell another story. Let’s start with the ballistics. The casing pulled from the scene allegedly doesn’t match Tyler’s weapon. The caliber, the markings, the entire ballistic fingerprint points to a different class of firearm. That’s not a minor discrepancy. That’s a brick wall.

Under normal rules, this is the moment the case pauses, resets, and pivots. But instead of pumping the brakes, investigators allegedly moved the original ballistics team off the case. Reports were sealed to protect the integrity of the investigation. Translation: Protect the narrative, not the science.

 Now, the residue, if Tyler had been the active residue levels on his hands and clothing should have been obvious and heavy. What came back was inconsistent, not the profile of a man who had just fired a rifle in close proximity. Again, the science whispers, “No, while the story screams, “Yes, then the phone pings.” Tyler’s device allegedly placed him on the opposite side of the venue at the critical moment.

 Far enough away that hitting the target from there would have been physically impossible. Add in the eyewitnesses who said they saw him walking casually minutes before, nowhere near the alleged firing spot, and you’ve got a man in custody who doesn’t even fit the timeline. And here’s the kicker, the cameras. The venue was laced with surveillance, but the one segment covering Tyler’s supposed position allegedly and conveniently went dark during the incident.

 Not the whole system, just that slice. A blackout window almost perfectly synced to the Tell me that’s not suspicious. Allegedly. Meanwhile, real witnesses are out here saying came from above. One bystander even described two firing sources. Those statements didn’t vanish into rumor mills. They were taken, filed, and then either redacted, misfiled, or buried.

 Instead of broadening the search, officials narrowed it, focusing everything on Tyler. So, on one side, we’ve got press conferences selling the story of teamwork and closure. On the other side, we’ve got bullet casings, gsr device data, and missing video that all scream contradiction. And when science and spin collide, the truth isn’t unclear.

 It’s being managed allegedly. And we now know Tyler Robinson, the man suspected of shooting Charlie Kirk, will appear in court in person next month. His second hearing was today. He appeared virtually from jail while he did not appear on camera or speak. We got to hear from his legal counsel for the first time.

 If the science didn’t fit Tyler Robinson from day one, then how did his name get locked into the narrative so fast? The answer sits in the timeline and in the messy chain of custody that followed. Within hours of the incident, Tyler’s name was already circulating inside federal emails and briefing notes. This was before the ballistic review came back before the residue results, before any verified witness ID.

 In other words, the suspect was chosen before the evidence was even analyzed. Allegedly, then came the chain of custody cracks. Ballistic specialists who first examined the recovered round, the very round that didn’t match Tyler’s weapon, were suddenly reassigned. Their reports weren’t amended. They were buried, sealed off under the banner of protecting the investigation’s integrity.

 Translation: Protect the conclusion already being sold to the public. And that wasn’t the only hiccup. A member of the security team has since admitted that a second individual was detained briefly right after the not processed, not photographed, not entered into any official record, questioned off the books, then released without documentation.

 No name, no follow-up, nothing. A ghost suspect who existed only for a few hours, then vanished from the narrative. There’s more. A vendor stationed near a staffonly exit allegedly told investigators they saw a man slip through that door moments after the shot. He wasn’t panicked. He wasn’t escorted.

 He moved like someone who knew exactly where to go and how to avoid attention. That statement allegedly taken, logged, and then disappeared. Never made it into the press briefings. Never acknowledged in the official story. Stack that on top of Tyler’s own alibi cracks. Multiple attendees placed him walking on the opposite side of the venue minutes before the not crouching near the platform, not hiding, walking casually like he didn’t even know what was about to go down.

 His phone data backs that up, pinging him far outside the supposed line of fire at the exact time the was heard. And the only cameras that could have cleared this up, they blacked out. Not the whole surveillance system, just the slice covering Tyler’s alleged position. The gap align almost perfectly with window.

 In any legitimate investigation, this stack of contradictions would have triggered a hard reset. Instead, it triggered silence. Witnesses were ignored. Reports were buried. Alternate suspects were erased. So, why is Tyler still the headline? Because shutting a case fast looks cleaner than solving it slow. And when a bullet casing doesn’t match, sometimes it’s not just the evidence being managed, it’s the entire timeline allegedly.

Obvious that we don’t know who all the witnesses are in this case yet. Um, I think it’s just important that if anyone um is identified that they have information about this order. So, I think other than that, we wouldn’t weigh in on any other matter. Thank you. Well, thank you for that question. That’s an important one.

 The court will rule that as the witnesses become known to each side that that information is conveyed to abide by this order. Obviously, there are potentially uh many witnesses and so it’s not the expectation that you would be able to do that upfront, but as they become known, I would ask that uh you would inform them. Here’s where things go from sloppy to sinister.

 The cracks in the Tyler Robinson story don’t just point to mistakes, they point to a pattern, one that screams, “There was always someone else.” Start with a rooftop angle. Multiple witnesses described the shot as coming from above. One bystander swore it was the rooftop, repeating it over and over to responding officers. Another claimed they saw a lone figure retreating seconds after the noise.

 Yet, when the official report came out, not a single mention of a rooftop was included. No search teams assigned to nearby buildings. No surveillance sweep above the venue. It’s like investigators deliberately looked everywhere but up, allegedly. Then there’s the two testimony. A bystander reported hearing two distinct firing sources.

 Not an echo, not distortion, two different weapons. That statement was formal, recorded, and then quietly marked inconsistent. Why erase it if it lined up with what others were saying? Because acknowledging a second would blow apart the one suspect’s script. The security gaps are just as telling. At a high-profile event like this, you’d expect rooftop spotters, aerial drones, thermal scans, standard protocol.

Instead, there was nothing, not a single trained observer positioned above the crowd, no drones in the sky, no overhead feed at all. Either this was a colossal lapse in planning or those gaps were intentional, blind spots carved out. so nobody would catch the real vantage point.

 And here’s the strangest part, Tyler’s position. The spot he was allegedly standing in was almost too convenient. Ground level, right near cameras and crowd control. Easy to photograph, easy to grab, easy to sell to the public as the but not where the trajectory lined up. It’s as if he was positioned to be seen, not to actually fire.

 Even his own defense tells on itself. Instead of hammering innocence after the ballistics mismatch, his legal team shifted to talk of mental health and mitigation. That’s not a defense strategy. That’s damage control. Allegedly, it looks like pressure. Don’t fight the narrative. Contain it. Behind the scenes, whispers grew louder. Insiders calling Tyler a placeholder, not the real shoe.

 Officers tied to the first phase investigation bound by NDAs. A federal contact admitting he was never expected to stand trial as the trigger man. When law enforcement starts gagging its own, it’s not about confusion, it’s about management. So, call it what it is, a second shooter pattern. Rooftops, blind spots, suppressed testimony, a convenient scapegoat on the ground.

Tyler Robinson isn’t just in the wrong place at the wrong time. He’s the decoy. Allegedly, when a bullet casing clears the man in cuffs, the story isn’t solved, it’s exposed. And that’s exactly where this case sits now. For Tyler Robinson, the legacy being built around him isn’t about guilt or innocence.

 It’s about being the face that fit the headline. The moment the round didn’t match his rifle, the system should have pivoted. Instead, they doubled down. His photo became the symbol of resolution, even as the science erased him from the trigger. That makes him less a suspect and more a placeholder.

 A man held up to keep the public calm while the real away. Allegedly for the FBI and local law enforcement, this is a credibility crisis. They stood on stage talking about good cops and great partnerships, bragging about leads and teamwork. But behind the speeches, ballistic specialists were shuffled off the case. Witness reports were redacted and surveillance gaps were ignored.

 That doesn’t look like procedure. It looks like protection. And when insiders start whispering about NDAs and second detainees who vanished from the record, the trust that fuels these institutions starts to collapse. For the public, the narrative is unraveling in real time. People aren’t just doubting Tyler’s role.

 They’re asking the bigger question. If not him, then who? The rooftop figure. The second source of fire. The mystery man slipping out through a staff exit. These aren’t internet rumors. They’re eyewitness testimonies taken on record then buried. Every time those cracks resurface, the official version looks less like truth and more like a script.

 So, what’s next? A fight over disclosure. Tyler’s defense can demand the sealed ballistics reports. They can push for raw surveillance logs and not the edited reels, the system level data that shows when cameras went dark. They can re-ubena the rooftop witnesses and drag the vendor back under oath. If they do, this case doesn’t just collapse against Tyler, it explodes outward, pointing toward whoever needed him blamed.

 And that’s the part officials fear most because once the second shooter becomes more than a whisper, every motive shifts. Was it about silencing Charlie Kirk? Was it about staging chaos for political theater? Or was it, as some allege, a performance designed never to end in prosecution at all?