Could a Hidden Engine Malfunction Be the True Cause Behind the AI-171 Crisis? Inside the New Simulation Data and What It Means for Aviation Worldwide

In a dramatic turn in the ongoing investigation of the Air India flight AI-171 emergency, new evidence has surfaced that could completely reshape the narrative around what caused the terrifying mid-air crisis.

In the latest episode of NewsHour Agenda with anchor Madhavdas Gopalkrishnan on Times Now, the spotlight was on a revealing new flight simulation conducted by independent aviation experts. The findings? Startling indications of a potential engine failure that may have gone undetected or unreported during the flight itself.

✈️ What Really Happened to Flight AI-171?

On June 12, Air India Flight AI-171, a Boeing 787 Dreamliner, faced a severe emergency that forced an unexpected landing and immediate investigation. At the time, official reports cited technical difficulties but offered little clarity on the nature or seriousness of the malfunction.

Now, with the release of simulation data, the spotlight turns to a possible failure in one of the engines — a development that casts doubt on initial statements and suggests the emergency may have been far more serious than originally disclosed.

“If these simulations are accurate, we’re not talking about a minor issue — we’re talking about a potentially catastrophic engine failure that could have compromised passenger safety,” says Amitesh Singh, a former DGCA official and aviation consultant.

⚠️ Could This Be a Systemic Problem?

The most alarming implication of the probe is the possibility of a cover-up or miscommunication between technical ground teams, flight crews, and oversight authorities.

Aviation analyst Dr. Rhea Kapoor pointed out:

“The troubling part isn’t just the mechanical issue. It’s that it might have been missed — or worse, ignored. This could be a serious lapse in protocol.”

The fact that the Boeing 787 involved reportedly had one engine recently replaced — and the other in active service for several years — only adds layers of complexity. Was the older engine the one that failed? Were there maintenance red flags that were overlooked?

🔍 What the Simulation Revealed

The simulation modeled the conditions of AI-171 during its critical moments of flight and revealed asymmetric thrust patterns, typically indicative of engine imbalance or power loss. Pilots in the simulation experienced difficulty maintaining altitude and direction under similar conditions, closely mirroring the real-life event.

“We couldn’t rule out a partial engine failure based on the flight profile. That’s what the data is pointing us toward,” said a lead technician involved in the testing, requesting anonymity.

📉 Impact on Air India and Boeing

If these findings are confirmed, they may lead to:

Increased scrutiny on Air India’s maintenance procedures

Regulatory reviews by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA)

Further investigation into Boeing’s engine-related advisories

A ripple effect across international carriers operating similar aircraft

Already, aviation safety advocates are calling for a global audit of Dreamliner engine performance, particularly on fleets where one engine has been replaced while the other remains from the original build.

🚨 What’s Next in the Investigation?

The DGCA, in coordination with Boeing and engine manufacturer Rolls-Royce, is now expected to reopen parts of the probe, particularly focusing on:

Engine maintenance logs

Pilot incident reports

Communications between air traffic control and cockpit

Pre- and post-flight inspection documents

Passengers aboard AI-171 have also begun to speak out, with some demanding transparency and accountability. Several civil aviation watchdogs are now pushing for new safety guidelines regarding mixed-engine installations and mandatory real-time engine health monitoring.

🛡️ A Wake-Up Call for the Aviation Industry?

While air travel remains statistically one of the safest modes of transport, incidents like AI-171 serve as stark reminders that complacency in aviation can be fatal. The real danger may not be the malfunction itself — but the failure to detect it in time.

Whether the AI-171 case turns out to be a one-off or the canary in the coal mine for deeper systemic issues, it has already sparked a renewed call for transparency, stricter oversight, and better technology in aviation diagnostics.

As this story continues to unfold, one thing is certain:
The skies may never feel quite the same again.