A Royal War of Words Erupts: “Meghan Left By Choice – The Crown Owes Her NOTHING,” Nicholl Declares

Top Mail journalist Katie Nicholl used illegally-obtained info in stories –  Byline Investigates

In a jaw-dropping twist that’s sent shockwaves through royal watchers and social media alike, famed royal biographer Katie Nicholl has fiercely rejected Doria Ragland’s now-viral claim that “Meghan bore the heirs” and deserves respect — if not restitution — from the British monarchy.

Doria’s remark, reportedly made in a private setting but leaked to tabloids, suggested that Meghan Markle’s children, Archie and Lilibet, as descendants of the royal bloodline, are inherently owed official titles and recognition — despite their parents’ controversial departure from royal duties.

But Nicholl isn’t having it.

“Meghan made the decision to step away,” Nicholl said during a heated roundtable with royal insiders. “Let’s be clear: the monarchy didn’t exile her. She left — on her own terms. And when you leave the Firm, you leave its privileges behind.”


“No Titles, No Debt” – A Harsh Reality Check

Nicholl’s statement has lit up the royal discourse online, especially her most stinging comment:

“The Royal Family owes Meghan absolutely nothing — not status, not protection, and certainly not courtesy titles for Archie and Lilibet. She walked away. You don’t get to rewrite the rules after resigning from the game.”

The reaction has been fierce and divided. Supporters of Meghan and Harry have flooded X (formerly Twitter) with hashtags like #JusticeForLilibet, while critics argue that Nicholl is simply stating the harsh truths of monarchy protocol.


Doria in the Crosshairs: “Emotion Isn’t Entitlement”

Nicholl didn’t stop at Meghan — she directly addressed Doria’s emotionally charged words as well:

“Of course Doria feels protective — she’s a mother. But emotion doesn’t entitle you to bend centuries of royal tradition.”

Sources close to Buckingham Palace reportedly agree, quietly stating that it was Meghan and Harry’s decision to “pursue financial independence and privacy,” and that doing so comes at a known cost: detachment from the Royal House’s obligations and privileges.


Unverified Claims, But a Very Real Firestorm

While this entire back-and-forth stems from sources that are, as of now, unconfirmed and unverified by official palace representatives, the media frenzy is very real — and growing by the hour.

Some commentators are urging caution.

“This is tabloid dynamite,” one royal correspondent told The Times. “But it’s also speculative. Doria has never made a formal public statement to this effect. And yet, we’re already watching the fallout unfold like a Shakespearean tragedy — in real time.”