In that wooded area, investigators found a boltaction rifle wrapped in a towel. The rifle contained one spent round and three unspent rounds. A bullet was just discovered at Charlie Kirk’s murder scene, and forensic experts confirm it doesn’t match Tyler Robinson’s rifle. The FBI is in full panic mode, desperately trying to bury this evidence before it unravels their entire case.

What weapon actually killed Charlie Kirk and who’s being protected? I have got the full story. Let’s get into it. The scene of the crime and growing questions. Let me take you back to that fateful day in Oram, Utah. Charlie Kirk was doing what he did best, engaging with students, debating political issues, and advocating for conservative values.

 The event drew approximately 3,000 people who gathered in an outdoor plaza to hear Kirk speak and participate in his signature prove me wrong format. The atmosphere was charged but peaceful with families and children present among the crowd. Turning Point USA, a nonprofit organization founded in 2012 by Charlie Kirk, organized a public outdoor event to be held at noon on September 10th, 2025 at UVU.

The event was the first in a series of similar events to be held at college campuses nationwide. Mr. Kirk is a well-known conservative activist famous for these type of events where he discusses various political issues and debates with audience members. Kirk was seated under a portable canopy positioned behind a table with a microphone, fielding questions from attendees who approached a microphone set up directly in front of him.

 His team members flanked him on both sides while temporary metal fencing separated the crowd by mere feet. Directly above and behind Kirk was the UVU Hall of Flags, an indoor walkway with floor-to-seeiling glass windows that overlooked the plaza. Then, approximately 15 minutes into the event, as Kirk was ironically answering a question about mass shootings by transgender individuals, a single gunshot pierced the air.

 The bullet struck Kirk in the neck. He slumped to the ground almost immediately. Within moments, the conservative icon was rushed to nearby Temponogos Regional Hospital, where he was pronounced dead. Approximately 15 minutes into the event, Mr. Kirk was answering a question about mass shootings by transgender individuals when a gunshot rang out.

 The bullet struck Mr. Kirk in the neck. He slumped to the ground almost immediately. The bullet’s trajec trajectory passed closely to several other individuals beside Mr. Kirk, including the questioner who was standing directly in front of Mr. Kirk. Children were visible near Mr. Kirk’s stage when he was shot. Mr.

 Kirk was rushed to a nearby hospital where he was declared deceased. But here’s where the story takes its first strange turn. From the very beginning, witnesses and experts noted something peculiar about Kirk’s wound. The autopsy reportedly found a bullet lodged beneath the skin on Kirk’s neck with no exit wound.

 The external damage was described as minimal, far less than what would typically be expected from the weapon authorities would later claim was used in the shooting. You see, the recovered weapon was identified as a vintage Mouser Model 98 bolt-action rifle chambered in 3006, a powerful hunting rifle known for its devastating impact at range.

 This is where ballistics experts began raising their eyebrows and scratching their heads in confusion. A306 round at the reported distance of approximately 142 yd typically delivers around 2,400 foot-lb of energy, more than enough to cause catastrophic damage to soft tissue like the neck. Ballistics experts and online analyses have questioned how a306 round could fail to exit the body, especially given the relatively short distance and the fact that it struck soft tissue rather than bone.

 Tests conducted on ballistics gel have shown that 30 AO6 rounds typically obliterate head and neck analoges, creating massive wound channels and almost always producing exit wounds. The minimal external damage and lack of exit wound simply doesn’t align with what we know about this caliber’s destructive power.

 Adding to the confusion, early reports indicated that no bullet was initially recovered from Kirk’s body. This raised immediate red flags among investigators and independent researchers. How could law enforcement definitively link the recovered rifle to the shooting without a bullet for ballistic matching? This discrepancy became even more pronounced when some sources suggested a 36 round was later discovered during autopsy approximately 10 days after the shooting.

 In that wooded area, investigators found a boltaction rifle wrapped in a towel. The rifle contained one spent round and three unspent rounds. This is consistent with the facts officers observed at the time of and immediately after the shootings. No shell casings were found on the roof, suggesting a bolt action rather than an autoloading weapon, and only a single round was fired.

 Let me paint you a clearer picture of just how unusual this wound pattern is. A 30 EO6 round at 150 to 200 yds delivers tremendous kinetic energy, typically causing what ballistics experts call hydrostatic shock. The temporary cavitation that occurs when a high velocity projectile passes through tissue. This creates a wound channel significantly larger than the bullet itself.

 The neck being composed primarily of soft tissue with major blood vessels and the trachea would be particularly vulnerable to this type of trauma. Footage from the scene reportedly shows no blood spatter behind Kirk, which would be highly unusual for a through and through shot from a high-powered rifle. Typically, a 3006 round passing through the neck would create a significant exit wound with associated blood spatter in the direction of the bullet’s travel.

 The absence of this evidence has led some to speculate that either a different caliber weapon was used or the official narrative about the shooting position and angle is incorrect. Critics have pointed to the minimal wound damage as inconsistent with a 30 CO6’s power, suggesting that even if the bullet fragmented upon impact or ricocheted off bone, an exit wound would still be likely in the soft tissue of the neck.

Some analysts have even suggested that the wound characteristics are more consistent with a smaller caliber weapon, possibly even a 22 round loaded into a 30 to06 casing, a practice sometimes used by those seeking to deceive investigators about the actual weapon used. The official narrative maintains that Tyler James Robinson, a 22-year-old from St.

 George, Utah, fired the fatal shot from a rooftop approximately 142 yards away. Robinson was arrested after a 33-hour manhunt and has been charged with aggravated murder with prosecutors seeking the death penalty. The evidence against him appears substantial on the surface. DNA on the rifle and towel, surveillance footage, and a series of damning text messages to his roommate.

 But as we peel back the layers of this investigation, inconsistencies begin to emerge that challenge the neat, tidy narrative authorities want us to accept. The ballistics don’t match. The wound pattern doesn’t match. And as we’ll explore in the next section, there are serious questions about whether the evidence was planted, manipulated, or if we’re looking at something far more sinister, a coordinated operation involving multiple shooters and a carefully constructed cover story.

 The mysterious bullet that allegedly killed Charlie Kirk may hold the key to unraveling one of the most complex assassinations in modern American history. But first, we need to understand exactly what doesn’t add up about the official story and why so many people from forensic experts to everyday citizens are refusing to accept the narrative being spun by federal investigators.

The evidence that doesn’t add up. As federal investigators rushed to close the case and declare it the work of a lone gunman, a growing chorus of voices began pointing out the glaring inconsistencies in the physical evidence. The more we examine what authorities claim happened versus what the evidence actually shows, the more the official narrative begins to crumble like a house of cards built on quicksand.

 Let’s start with the weapon itself and the bizarre journey it allegedly took after the shooting. According to the official account, Robinson climbed onto a roof at approximately 12:15 p.m., set up his shooting position, fired a single shot at 12:23 p.m., and then fled the scene carrying the rifle. Surveillance footage allegedly shows him running across the roof, climbing down, and disappearing into a wooded area northeast of campus, where the rifle was later found wrapped in a towel.

 But here’s the first major problem with this narrative. The timeline simply doesn’t work when you factor in the physical constraints and the alleged text message exchange that followed. Text messages allegedly sent by Robinson to his roommate Lance Twigs describe in extraordinary detail his attempts to retrieve the rifle from where he had hidden it.

 In these messages, Robinson supposedly writes about being stuck in Orum and needing to grab his rifle, about seeing police vehicles near where he left it, and about being concerned that he might have to abandon it because he was worried about fingerprints. Not always. I just noticed that around some of these exchanges there’s ellipses above them.

You’re breaking up a little bit. What’ you say? around some of these exchanges, there’s ellipses above if you look really closely. Yeah. And it looks like they’re cherrypicking certain exchanges. So that my data is super maggot just comes out of nowhere because they picked it from a totally different part of the conversation.

Now, let me ask you this. If you just committed one of the highest profile assassinations in recent American history, would your immediate concern be texting your roommate detailed descriptions of your escape plan, the location of the murder weapon and your concerns about your grandfather’s rifle, or would you perhaps be focused on getting as far away as possible and maintaining absolute radio silence? The text messages themselves raise serious red flags among forensic linguistics experts and anyone with basic common

sense. Candace Owens, a former colleague of Kirks, has pointed out numerous oddities in the language used, including the use of the term squad car, terminology more commonly used by law enforcement than civilians, and the phrase changed outfits, which she notes is language typically used by women rather than men, who would more likely say changed clothes.

 But perhaps the most damning inconsistency involves the inscriptions on the bullet casings. But perhaps the most damning inconsistency involves the inscriptions on the bullet casings. The recovered ammunition had messages engraved on them, including phrases like notices bulges. Oo, what’s this? A furry meme.

 Hey fascist, catch, a reference to the video game Hell Divers 2, Bella Chow, an anti-fascist song, and if you read this, you are gay. L M AO. These inscriptions were initially misreported by some media outlets as being related to transgender ideology or Antifa messaging, leading to significant misinformation and later retractions.

 Each round in the rifle contained an etched inscription as follows. The fired cartridge was etched. No Tyus bulge. Ow. What’s this? The second cartridge that was that was again not spent. The the last three were not spent were not fired. The second Hey fascist catch with arrow symbols. The third cartridge. Oh Bella cow. Bella chow.

 Bella chow chow chow. The fourth cartridge. If you read this you are gay. L M A O. In the alleged text messages, Robinson supposedly tells his roommate, “Remember how I was engraving bullets? The effing messages are mostly a big meme. If I see notices bulge on Fox News, I might have a stroke.” This casual reference to his supposedly secret assassination plot raises an obvious question.

 Why would someone planning a political assassination engrave joke messages on the bullets? It’s either the work of someone deeply unserious about what they’re doing, or it’s evidence planted to create a certain narrative. The forensic evidence surrounding the rifle itself presents additional problems. DNA consistent with Robinson was found on the trigger, other parts of the rifle, the fired cartridge casing, two of the three unfired cartridges, and the towel.

On the surface, this appears to be damning evidence, but forensic DNA experts know that DNA transfer is a complex phenomenon. DNA can be transferred through secondary and even tertiary contact. If someone handled an object that Robinson had touched and then that person handled the rifle, Robinson’s DNA could end up on the weapon without him ever directly touching it.

 Moreover, according to sources close to the investigation, Robinson’s DNA was not the only DNA found on the weapon. Multiple unidentified DNA profiles were allegedly recovered, raising questions about who else may have handled the rifle. Why hasn’t law enforcement been transparent about these additional DNA profiles? Who else touched this weapon? And why isn’t the FBI interested in identifying them? The surveillance footage presents its own set of problems.

 The only publicly released footage shows a figure in dark clothing moving across campus, but the images are grainy and the individual keeps their head down, making positive identification difficult. Robinson’s family members have reportedly stated that they don’t believe the person in the surveillance photos is their son. Even more troubling, an eyewitness who filmed footage of someone on the roof has stated that he doesn’t believe the person he saw was Tyler Robinson.

 This witness, who has experience with firearms and teaches people how to shoot, has said that the individual he observed was wearing tactical gear, not the t-shirt and jeans that Robinson was allegedly wearing. He also stated that the weapon he saw didn’t match the description of the recovered Mouser rifle. Yeah, these messages are clearly doctorred is what I would say.

 They’re doctorred. Now, they could decide why they’re doing that. Tyler’s being, you know, forthcoming. We’re protecting him in some capacity. I find that to be unacceptable. Okay. Unacceptable. I want every single text message. I want timestamps. It’s It is conspicuous that you are not telling us when this was sent because it sounds like it’s when the campus is on lockdown and he’s got to go back and he’s got to clean up and then all of a sudden we’re in the next day when his dad is getting clued in after the picture’s been released.

Candace Owens has been particularly vocal about the lack of complete timestamps on the text messages, noting that without this crucial information, it’s impossible to establish a proper timeline of events. The messages appear to have been edited or cherrypicked with ellipses appearing above certain exchanges, suggesting that important context may have been removed.

 This raises the disturbing possibility that the text message evidence has been manipulated to support a predetermined narrative. The clothing inconsistency is another major issue that refuses to go away. Initial reports suggested Robinson was seen on campus in two different outfits.

 First in light khaki shorts and a maroon shirt and later in black clothing. However, a photo allegedly taken at a nearby Dairy Queen at 6:38 p.m. shows someone identified as Robinson wearing jeans and the maroon shirt, a combination of both alleged outfits. This doesn’t make logical sense. If Robinson changed clothes to avoid detection after the shooting, why would he wear a combination that includes the distinctive maroon shirt from the morning? The Dairy Queen photo raises its own questions.

 The location is approximately 15 minutes away from campus at a time when Robinson was allegedly hiding near campus trying to retrieve his rifle. The individual in the photo appears calm and composed, not like someone who had just committed murder and was on the run from law enforcement. For someone with no criminal record, who had just shot and killed a public figure in front of thousands of witnesses, this level of composure seems almost impossible.

Perhaps most damningly, sources have indicated that investigators lack footage showing how the rifle actually got onto the roof. The surveillance allegedly shows Robinson climbing onto the roof at 12:15 p.m. with what appears to be a rifle concealed in his pants based on his unusual gate. But if the rifle was a fulllength mouser, even broken down, it would be extremely difficult to conceal in this manner.

 The lack of clear footage of the weapon being transported onto the roof is a glaring omission that undermines the entire official narrative. The bullet itself, or rather the lack of a bullet that matches the claimed weapon, remains the central mystery. According to multiple sources, the recovered projectile was too fragmented to definitively match it to Robinson’s rifle.

 This is extraordinarily convenient for investigators who are trying to close the case quickly. Without a ballistic match between the bullet and the rifle, the entire chain of evidence becomes circumstantial. Adding to the ballistics confusion, some analysts have suggested that the wound characteristics are more consistent with a shot from a different angle than the official shooting position, possibly from slightly behind Kirk rather than from the elevated position 142 yd away.

This would suggest either a second shooter or that the actual shooting position was different from what authorities claim. The more we examine the physical evidence, the more questions arise. Why was there no blood spatter consistent with a 3006 exit wound? Why doesn’t the minimal neck damage align with the devastating power of this caliber? How could Robinson have been simultaneously trying to retrieve his rifle near campus while appearing calm at a Dairy Queen 15 minutes away? Why are there multiple DNA profiles on

the weapon? Why can’t investigators produce footage of the rifle being transported onto the roof? These aren’t the questions of conspiracy theorists seeing shadows where none exist. These are legitimate forensic questions that any competent investigation would need to answer before declaring the case closed.

 Yet, the FBI under Director Cash Patel appears to be rushing to judgment, pressuring Utah authorities to declare this a lone gunman case and move on. The cover up and what they’re hiding. As the inconsistencies in the physical evidence mounted, something even more troubling began to emerge. A pattern of behavior by federal investigators that suggests not just incompetence, but active suppression of information and pressure to close the case before all the facts are known.

 According to well-placed sources, the FBI has been putting absurd amounts of pressure on Utah authorities to officially close the Charlie Kirk case and declare it the work of a lone gunman. This pressure campaign allegedly includes threats that keeping the case open might mess up the prosecution against Tyler Robinson.

 Think about that for a moment. Federal investigators are essentially engaging in moral blackmail, suggesting that seeking the truth might jeopardize their ability to convict the accused. And I have a lot for you today because you’re not going to be surprised to hear that the FBI is FBIing. That’s what they do and that’s what they want to happen with the Charlie Kirk case.

 Of course, this was inevitable. I got to tell you all about that. Also, I want to open up to you guys about this overwhelming sense of doom that came over me about 10 days prior to Charlie Kirk’s assassination. And the story is kind of unbelievable, but I think it’s important to share, especially with the way that uh they’re traveling here, trying the FBI is traveling, trying to shut this case down.

But here’s what makes this pressure campaign particularly suspicious. The FBI allegedly has no video footage showing Tyler Robinson actually firing the weapon or even taking aim at Charlie Kirk. The most crucial moment of the entire incident, the actual shooting, is apparently not captured on any of the extensive surveillance systems at UVU.

For a campus that has cameras covering virtually every angle of the plaza where Kirk was speaking, this is a remarkable gap in documentation. Even more damaging to the official narrative, the single eyewitness who filmed footage of the shooter on the roof has stated that he doesn’t believe the person he saw was Tyler Robinson.

 This witness, whose testimony would be crucial in any trial, has indicated that the individual he observed was wearing entirely different clothing than what Robinson allegedly wore, specifically tactical gear rather than the t-shirt and jeans described in the indictment. He also noted that the weapon he saw didn’t match the description of the recovered Mouser rifle.

 The handling of evidence by federal investigators follows a disturbing pattern we’ve seen before in high-profile cases. Immediately after the shooting, FBI agents swept through the area, collecting all available footage from businesses and residents. According to local sources, anyone who had captured video was instructed not to share it publicly with vague warnings about how releasing footage might interfere with the investigation.

 This is classic information control, not the behavior of investigators seeking truth, but of handlers managing a narrative. One particularly compelling piece of evidence that somehow made its way past the FBI’s drag net is a photo allegedly taken at a nearby Dairy Queen at 6:38 p.m. on September 10th.

 The image, which circulated among ORM residents before reaching independent investigators, shows an individual identified as Robinson appearing calm and composed eating at the restaurant. The timestamp places this just hours after the shooting at a time when Robinson was supposedly hiding near campus, desperately trying to retrieve his rifle while evading police.

 The federal pressure to close the case becomes even more suspicious when you consider what investigators are allegedly unable to explain. Sources indicate that authorities cannot account for how the rifle actually got onto the roof. While surveillance allegedly shows Robinson climbing onto the roof, there’s no clear footage of him transporting a fulllength rifle, even one that could be broken down.

 This is a fundamental gap in the chain of evidence that any competent investigation would need to resolve. Moreover, the bullet recovered from Kirk’s body was reportedly too fragmented to definitively match it to Robinson’s rifle. Without this crucial ballistic evidence, the entire case against Robinson rests on circumstantial evidence, DNA that could have been transferred, text messages whose authenticity and timing are questionable, and surveillance footage that even witnesses say doesn’t show the person they saw on the roof.

 Tyler Robinson himself, according to all official accounts, has not actually confessed to the shooting. His arrest came after his parents recognized him from released photos and convinced him to turn himself in with the help of a family friend who is a retired law enforcement officer. But recognizing your son in a grainy surveillance photo and him being the actual shooter are two very different things.

 The rushed nature of the arrest without a formal confession or direct evidence linking Robinson to the trigger pull raises serious questions about whether investigators have the right person. The pattern of federal coverups in high-profile assassinations is well documented throughout American history. From JFK to RFK to the attempted assassination of President Trump on July 13th, 2024, we see the same playbook repeated.

 rapid arrests, sealed evidence, pressure on local authorities and narratives that conveniently close cases before all questions can be answered. Candace Owens has drawn explicit parallels between the Charlie Kirk case and the Thomas Matthew Krooks case, noting similar patterns of evidence suppression and federal overreach.

 Speaking of the Crooks case, newly revealed information shows that the 20-year-old who attempted to assassinate President Trump had an extensive online history of violent threats and obsessive behavior that should have put him on federal radar long before he climbed onto that roof in Butler, Pennsylvania. His search history included queries like best places for a mass shooting, how to make a Molotov cocktail, and obsessive research into previous assassinations.

 Yet somehow federal investigators claimed they had no advanced warning. The parallels to the Kirk case are striking. Owens revealed never-before-seen footage of Crooks practicing shooting in his bedroom along with a comprehensive 80page document detailing his online activities, violent rhetoric, and gradual radicalization.

 The fact that this information was systematically scrubbed from the internet by federal investigators raises obvious questions. What else are they hiding? And why are they so determined to control the narrative around these assassinations? The political dimensions of the Kirk assassination cannot be ignored. In the weeks leading up to his death, Kirk was reportedly under intense pressure from major Jewish donors regarding his shifting stance on Israel and his willingness to platform controversial figures like Tucker Carlson and Dave

Smith. Sources indicate that in the 48 hours before his assassination, a major donor demanded their name be removed from a Turning Point USA building only to reverse that decision after Kirk’s death. The Hampton’s meeting between Kirk, Bill Aman, and other major donors in early August 2025 has become a focal point for those questioning the official narrative.

 Attendees have confirmed that Kirk faced significant pressure at this event regarding his positions on Israel and the speakers he was platforming. The very next day, August 6th, Kirk appeared on Megan Kelly’s show and spoke passionately about feeling pressured and morally blackmailed by those who disagreed with his evolving views.

 Local theories about what actually happened in Oram offer a very different picture than the official narrative. According to sources on the ground, many residents believe Tyler Robinson was instructed to simply drop off a weapon, possibly as part of a blackmail or coercion scheme related to concerning material found on computers shared with his roommate.

 The theory suggests that the actual shooter was a different individual who used a vacant house owned by UVU, located near where the rifle was found, as a safe house after the shooting. This theory would explain several anomalies. Why Robinson appeared calm at Dairy Queen hours after the shooting. Why the wound pattern doesn’t match the alleged weapon.

 Why there’s no clear footage of the rifle being transported onto the roof. And why multiple DNA profiles were allegedly found on the weapon. It would also explain the detailed text messages. They could have been written by someone other than Robinson using his phone to establish a false narrative. The presence of a mysterious decoy boy who falsely claimed responsibility for the shooting adds another layer of intrigue.

This 71-year-old individual, George Zinn, jumped up immediately after the shooting and appeared to confess, creating confusion and potentially buying time for the actual shooter to escape. When police investigated Zinn, they discovered he had child pornography on his phone, material that could make him vulnerable to coercion or blackmail.

Was Zinn’s bizarre behavior spontaneous, or was he playing a role in a larger operation? The FBI’s history with programs like MK Ultra, which experimented with mind control and creating programmed assassins, cannot be dismissed when examining cases like this. Owens has stated her belief that such programs never truly ended and that vulnerable individuals often found in schools and online communities are identified and manipulated into carrying out political assassinations.

 The pattern of lone gunmen who show signs of radicalization but somehow escape federal scrutiny until after they commit their acts is too consistent to be mere coincidence. As Candace Owens stated, “This is not a battle between left and right, but between good and evil.” The forces working to cover up the truth about Kirk’s assassination don’t care about your political affiliation.

 They care about maintaining power and control. Whether Tyler Robinson pulled the trigger or was a psy in a larger operation, the American people have a right to know the full truth about what happened on September 10th, 2025. The mysterious bullet that doesn’t match the shooter’s weapon is more than just a forensic anomaly.

 It’s a smoking gun pointing to a coverup that reaches the highest levels of federal law enforcement. Until we get answers about this bullet, about the ballistic inconsistencies, about the timeline gaps and the suppressed evidence, we cannot accept the official narrative that this was simply the work of one radicalized young man acting alone, the truth is out there, buried under layers of federal obfiscation and narrative control.

 But as more inconsistencies emerge, as more witnesses come forward, and as more independent investigators refuse to accept the official story, that truth is beginning to see the light of day. The only question is whether those in power will allow it to fully emerge or whether they’ll continue to pressure Utah authorities to close the case and declare mission accomplished.

 Charlie Kirk deserves justice. The American people deserve truth. And Tyler Robinson, whether he’s guilty or innocent, deserves a thorough investigation that follows the evidence wherever it leads, not one that’s predetermined by federal handlers desperate to close the case. Thank you for watching.

 If you enjoyed watching this video, click on one of the boxes playing on your screen to watch more similar content.