Just when everyone thought the Charlie Kirk murder case was over, a new video has shaken the whole thing up again. A U.S. Navy veteran who served more than 15 years as a technical surveillance and tactical video analyst has released a frame-by-frame analysis of the September 10 shooting.

And what he found, he says, is “something they never wanted you to see.”

The nearly 40-minute analysis, posted on an independent veterans forum, quickly went viral. In less than six hours, the video had surpassed 2 million views before it was taken down “for copyright reasons.” But the online community had already saved copies — and the details in it have left even those who believe the most official version of the story speechless.

Who is the man in frame 214?

According to the veteran — who has been identified only as “Michael R.” — the original police video was cut off the first five seconds and the last three seconds. He used specialized military software to restore the image data from the leaked version.

In his analysis, Michael pointed out a shocking detail:

“In frame 214, a silhouette appears on the opposite roof — a location where, according to the investigation records, no one was recorded at that time.”

He zoomed in on the image, using an infrared filter to highlight the reflective objects. The result: a small object, shaped like a telescopic sight, was seen reflecting light for exactly 0.3 seconds.

If true, this could completely disprove the claim that there was only one shooter at the scene.

“The Blind Spots the Media Doesn’t Want You to See”

Michael didn’t stop at frame 214, but continued to analyze the entire video sequence—from the student’s perspective, to the school security camera, to the clip posted by a freelance reporter on social media.

He said there was a “blind spot” lasting more than 12 seconds in the main video, where the audio was out of phase—that is, the second gunshot didn’t match the camera image.

This, he said, could be a sign of at least two different firing positions.

“I served in surveillance operations in Afghanistan. When I watched this video, I recognized the signs of a ‘crossfire’—fire across two directions. A normal person wouldn’t see that. But to us, it was a clear sign of an organized plan.”

Evidence “hidden” in the file

What’s remarkable, according to Michael, is that he tried to contact independent investigators for three weeks but no one responded. Meanwhile, a copy of the forensic file leaked on the Reddit forum also showed that there were two different types of bullets found at the scene — but only one was officially released.

When asked why this was hidden, Michael said:

“Because if you admit it, the whole case will have to be reopened from the beginning. And that will cost a lot of people their jobs — or worse, it will be revealed that they knew about this all along.”

The online community is fiercely divided

Soon after Michael’s video went viral, social media was divided into two fiercely controversial streams.
One side said this was just a “conspiracy theory” made up to attract views. But the other side — including many former military officers and image analysis experts — asserted that Michael’s arguments were “completely well-founded.”

An anonymous military technology expert commented under the video:

“The way he processed the data, removed image noise and compared the reflected light was not amateurish. This is a method only those who have worked as tactical surveillance know.”

Meanwhile, the investigation team’s official website only posted a short notice:

“There is no evidence to prove the existence of a second shooter. The case remains closed.”

This answer, instead of quelling doubts, made the public feel that something was wrong.

A scary coincidence: the video disappeared at the right time

Another detail that made public opinion boil was that Michael R.’s entire video was removed from the original platform just 17 minutes after he published it.

The forum administrator said they “received a request from the cybersecurity agency” to remove the content because it “violated the regulations on the protection of eyewitness images.” But just 2 hours later, dozens of copies appeared on Twitter (X), Telegram, and even TikTok.

“It’s weird. I’ve seen hundreds of fake videos floating around and no one touched them. But when a veteran says something reasonable — it disappears in less than 20 minutes,” one user commented.

Details Omitted from the FBI Report

One of the “creepy” points is when Michael quotes the FBI report (the leaked version).

In it, there is a passage that clearly states:

“Camera 3 at the west corner had a technical error at 18:42:11 and only returned to operation at 18:45:00.”

The problem is, 18:42 is the exact time the main shooting took place.

This means that the most important camera — one that pointed directly at the stage — had “accidentally” stopped working at exactly three fateful minutes.

Michael commented:

“In the military, when a camera stops working at the exact moment a target is shot, we call it ‘the perfect scenario.’ There is no coincidence here.”

Insiders begin to speak out

After Michael’s video was shared, a technician who worked on Charlie Kirk’s event logistics team also anonymously emailed an independent news outlet.

In the email, the person claimed to have been asked to “temporarily delete the video data from the secondary server” just hours after the incident.

“At the time, I thought it was just for personal security. But when I saw Michael’s video, I realized I may have deleted important evidence,” the person wrote.

The identity of this employee has not yet been verified, but the contents of the letter match the time periods Michael mentioned in his analysis.

“One of them” – the scariest theory

At the end of the video, Michael put forward a theory that silenced the entire online community:

“I don’t believe this was an outside attack. Based on the direction of the shot, the angle of the bullet, and the position of the guard, I believe one of Kirk’s security team may have been involved.”

According to him, the second shot had a lower angle of origin, near the stage area — where only the internal security team was allowed to stand.

This, if confirmed, would be the biggest explosion since the incident: an insider assassination, covered up by blaming a “lone gunman.”

Media earthquake

After 48 hours, the keyword “#KirkFootage214” climbed to the top 1 Twitter trend in the US.
Major news outlets like NewsNation, The Daily Wire, and TMZ Politics all mentioned the “Marine veteran video,” although each reported from a different angle.

Candace Owens, who was criticized for her controversial comments about the incident, suddenly reshared the video with a short caption:

“I said it all along — and now you’re seeing what I saw.”

However, just a few hours later, her post was taken down without notice.

A media expert commented:

“The way the platforms responded almost simultaneously shows there’s an underlying pressure. This is no longer an online rumor — this is a battle for control of information.”

Michael R. Disappears

The next morning, Michael R.’s accounts on all platforms were locked.

A close friend of his posted online:

“Michael said he was going to leave the house for a few days because he felt like he was being followed. No one has been able to contact him since.”

No one knows where he is now. But copies of his videos continue to circulate — and every day thousands more people believe the Charlie Kirk case was never fully investigated.