She’s finally posted all the results from DNA, teeth, eyes, and voice analysis

Julia Faustyna, also known by the names Julia Wandelt and Julia Wendell, has now published all the supposed evidence she is Madeleine McCann after “world experts” compared her features to DNA found at the crime scene of the girl’s disappearance.

Madeleine McCann went missing in 2007, but her so-called doppelganger Julia did not appear until 2023 when she launched her “I Am Madeleine McCann” Instagram profile. Though initial findings disapproved her theory, she returned to the internet again in November while promising new evidence.

After teasing said evidence last week, Julia posted several updates with what she sees as proof.

Exhibit A: Julia posted the DNA results

“Part one of the DNA results shows that I am not 100 per cent Polish as you were informed by Fia Johansson,” she said, referencing the psychic who first rejected her claims. “My actual DNA results show that I am part British, part Irish.”

In part two, Julia claimed that her DNA was analysed by the “highly respected” scientist Dr Monte Miller. He reportedly has a PhD in biochemistry from Linda Loma University and a bachelor’s in biochemistry that he received from UC Riverside.

Though she didn’t post the full results, an email from the professor allegedly reads: “The simple answer is that the subject is not the source of the DNA on the evidence, because their DNA is not fully established EVERYWHERE. However, they do match fairly well, more than I would expect at random, and a specific pattern emerges that looks like an almost certain family connection. I would look for a child, parent, or sibling.”

Then, in part three of the DNA analysis done by an undisclosed scientist, Julia noted how Madeleine’s DNA was found in hair and saliva at the crime scene.

“The genetic evidence strongly supports that McCann could be Julia Wandelt’s biological father,” it said.

2. Exhibit B: Voice comparison results

Though it’s not immediately clear who did the voice comparison, or how the voice of a child could be matched to an adult, Julia described how “pitch, loudness, and spectral centroid” likely meant the voices belonged to the same person. There were some discrepancies, but apparently those could be explained away by recording conditions and vocal delivery.

3. Exhibit C: Teeth comparison results

In the alleged conclusion of the report, the undisclosed expert wrote: “After analyzing the detailed characteristics both inside and outside the mouth, all photos undeniably belong to the same person. The consistent dental traits (shape, alignment, spacing, gum line) and external fact features (Cheek lifting, gum shape, and proportions) confirm this conclusion.”

4. Exhibit D: Eye comparison results

This time, analysis was reportedly done by Rocco Antonio Visentis who graduated from Edinburgh Napier University with a specialisation in image analysis and visual communication. I could not find any supporting information online about his qualifications.

In the two video explanations, which looked to have been done in Photoshop, Rocco talked through his analysis which seemed to be largely based on how the eyes matched when overlayed.